PROGRAMME (UNDER CONSTRUCTIONS).
Note: The programme indicates both EDT (time zone of the conference) and GMT+1 (London/Lisbon)
Breaks are highlighted in orange. Please note that during some of the breaks the main conference may be running talks. Cf. main conference programme.
ABSTRACTS available here (to be added)
PART I
09:00-09:20 (EDT) 14:00-14:15 (GMT+1):
Welcoming and Introduction
Welcoming and introduction (15 min)
Procedural and methodological notes (5 min)
09:20-09:45 (EDT) 14:20-14:45 (GMT+1):
Framing presentations
Overview of the outcomes of the 1st edition and legacy questions 09:20-09:35 (EDT time zone) (10 min)
Framing presentation 1 (5 min)
Framing presentation 2 (5 min)
Framing presentation 3 (5 min)
09:45-10:15 (EDT)/ 14:45-15:15 (GMT+1):
Invited Keynote presentation I (20 min + 5 Q&A)
Combing innovative inclusive methods: systems thinking, complexity science, the arts, humanities, and beyond
Pete Barbrook-Johnson,
Department of Arts and Sciences, UCL; Institute for New Economic Thinking, University of Oxford; Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford; Centre for the Evaluation of Complexity Across the Nexus, University of Surrey
10:15-10:30 (EDT)/15:15-15:30 (GMT+1)
Break
10:30-11:30 (EDT)/15:30-16:30 (GMT+1)
Contributing talks
Contributing talk 1 (15 min + 3 min Q&A)
Contributing talk 2 (15 min + 3 min Q&A)
Contributing talk 3 (15 min + 3 min Q&A)
Contributing Lightning talks
11:30-11:45 (EDT)/ 16:30- 16:45 (GMT+1)
Lightning talk 1 (5 min)
Lightning talk 2 (5 min)
Lightning talk 3 (5 min)
Invited Talk/Contributing talk
11:45-12:00 (EDT)- 16:45-17:00 (GMT+1)
12:00-13:00/ 17:00-18:00
Break (coinciding with Lunch break at main conference)
13:00-13:20(EDT)/ 18:00-18:20
Poster session
13:30-14:30 (EDT)
[Break/ Keynote at the main conference, cf. Conference main program]
PART II
FACILITATED COLLECTIVE EXPLORATORY DIALOGUE
14:30-17:45/ 19:30-22:45
Overview of the Relatoscope Method and guidance (10 min)
Facilitated focused discussion* with the Relatoscope Method (80 min)
16:00-16:30/ 21:00- 21:30
Break
16:30-17:30 (EDT)/21:30-22:30 (GMT+1)
Facilitated focused discussion *with the Relatoscope Method (cont) (60 min)
17:30-16:45 (EDT)/ 22:30- 22:45 (GMT+1) Closing
Integration and next steps (15 min)
*Focus questions for the dialogue:
What kind of difficult and challenging questions call for new methodological developments and how can qualitative approaches and creative interactions and mixings between qualitative, quantitative and AI methods be explored to promote novel insights and abductive leaps leading to more complex knowledge, capable of guiding actions?
What qualities and features of complex systems pose particular methodological challenges and/or call for new approaches and how can they be best captured by qualitative and synergetic/mixing-methods approaches?
What is “slipping” through or remaining invisible with mainstream methods and approaches that calls for methodological alternatives and innovations and of what kind?
How can we increase the methodological coherence of our research with the nature of complex systems with qualitative and interacting or “mixing”-methods approaches?
What guiding principles and meta-methodologies or frameworks can guide the exploration of synergies in the interaction between methods?
How can qualitative approaches inform complexity informed methodologies?
How can different philosophical approaches, and ontological and epistemological perspectives, inform different kinds of approaches to qualitative or mixing methods research on complex social systems?
How can synergetic, interacting or “mixing”-methods approaches reveal that which escapes our habitual methods and how can it support abduction? How can abduction inform the process of exploring methodological synergies?
What is the role of the researcher in complex methodological creativity?
What are the challenges of training for methodological complexity? What distinctive methodological challenges arise when studying complex social and human systems, compared with non-human or physical complex systems?
What kinds of methodological issues do complex social systems bring that may be different to non-social/human complex systems?